Dear Traders,
If you feel that the Admins should respond more to our outstanding queries, please upvote and comment on this post.
Really, Angel has the potential to become the best broker in India for Algo traders, but there is no follow up and adequate quality control for the API.
Hoping that Angel will devote more resources to the API Team.
Regards
Cyriac
@pari @admin @admin123 @administrators
The data coming from the API is incorrect.
LTP data is wrong. Instead the closeprice is being returned for ltp.
What a nightmare! Something like this can wipe out an Algo trader. Within minutes!
Serious Issue
LTP is coming as Close Price !!!
print(obj.position()['data'])
[{'symboltoken': '1594', 'symbolname': 'INFY', 'instrumenttype': '', 'priceden': '1.00', 'pricenum': '1.00', 'genden': '1.00', 'gennum': '1.00', 'precision': '2', 'multiplier': '-1', 'boardlotsize': '1', 'exchange': 'NSE', 'producttype': 'INTRADAY', 'tradingsymbol': 'INFY-EQ', 'symbolgroup': 'EQ', 'strikeprice': '-1.0', 'optiontype': '', 'expirydate': '', 'lotsize': '1', 'cfbuyqty': '0', 'cfsellqty': '0', 'cfbuyamount': '0.00', 'cfsellamount': '0.00', 'buyavgprice': '1395.80', 'sellavgprice': '0.00', 'avgnetprice': '1395.80', 'netvalue': '-1395.80', 'netqty': '1', 'totalbuyvalue': '1395.80', 'totalsellvalue': '0.00', 'cfbuyavgprice': '0.00', 'cfsellavgprice': '0.00', 'totalbuyavgprice': '1395.80', 'totalsellavgprice': '0.00', 'netprice': '1395.80', 'buyqty': '1', 'sellqty': '0', 'buyamount': '1395.80', 'sellamount': '0.00', 'pnl': '-7.00', 'realised': '-0.00', 'unrealised': '-7.00', 'ltp': '1388.8', 'close': '1411.55'}, {'symboltoken': '2885', 'symbolname': 'RELIANCE', 'instrumenttype': '', 'priceden': '1.00', 'pricenum': '1.00', 'genden': '1.00', 'gennum': '1.00', 'precision': '2', 'multiplier': '-1', 'boardlotsize': '1', 'exchange': 'NSE', 'producttype': 'INTRADAY', 'tradingsymbol': 'RELIANCE-EQ', 'symbolgroup': 'EQ', 'strikeprice': '-1.0', 'optiontype': '', 'expirydate': '', 'lotsize': '1', 'cfbuyqty': '0', 'cfsellqty': '0', 'cfbuyamount': '0.00', 'cfsellamount': '0.00', 'buyavgprice': '2542.48', 'sellavgprice': '2544.95', 'avgnetprice': '2517.75', 'netvalue': '-2517.75', 'netqty': '1', 'totalbuyvalue': '27967.25', 'totalsellvalue': '25449.50', 'cfbuyavgprice': '0.00', 'cfsellavgprice': '0.00', 'totalbuyavgprice': '2542.48', 'totalsellavgprice': '2544.95', 'netprice': '2517.75', 'buyqty': '11', 'sellqty': '10', 'buyamount': '27967.25', 'sellamount': '25449.50', 'pnl': '39.02', 'realised': '24.70', 'unrealised': '14.32', 'ltp': '2556.8', 'close': '2538.0'}]
Hi @admin and @Moderator_1 , @Moderator_2
Just a quick question here. I am looking to be able to calculate the margin for Options via API. The above end point should work fine, but I am wondering how to implement it for Option sell position when an buy position is already open.
As you are aware, there is a difference in margin calculations for naked sell and covered sell. So please can you give some information regarding this.
Many Thanks
Cyriac
Hi @admin
Small Question. How can I read in the API Websocket Data for just the parameters I would like. I am trying to get the LTP, LTQ, Bid & Ask with time stamp into json / csv format file?
Much Appreciated the Help.
Cyriac
Hi @admin @Moderator_1 @Moderator_2 ,
Can you please reconfirm the rate limits for Market Quote?
I still don't think it is correct.
Here is the output from my code. It ran from 11:45 to about 12:11 then returned error. As you can see, I am only making a single call to the end point every 2 to 3 seconds. Which is about 20 per minute and 1200 every hour. This is well within the limit of 10 per second, 500 a minute and 5000 per hour.
Also, if there are 40 tokens are called for just LTP is it considered as one call or 40 calls? (According to the documentation it should be considered as just 1 call... Still this wont explain the issue).
Regards
Cyriac
12 Mar - 11:44:46: Bank Nifty Index Open_Price: 47351.35
12 Mar - 11:44:50: Tokens: ['99926009', '41845', '41856', '41858', '41867', '41875', '41880', '41889', '41892', '41894', '41899', '41908', '41912', '41914', '41916', '41918', '41921', '41927', '41937', '41939', '41946', '41950', '41855', '41857', '41866', '41873', '41879', '41882', '41890', '41893', '41897', '41901', '41911', '41913', '41915', '41917', '41920', '41925', '41935', '41938', '41944', '41949', '41951']
12 Mar - 11:45:55: Table created successfully.
12 Mar - 12:11:55: An error occurred: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='apiconnect.angelbroking.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /rest/secure/angelbroking/market/v1/quote/ (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x00000000129154F0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [WinError 10060] A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'))
12 Mar - 12:13:54: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
12 Mar - 12:13:56: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
12 Mar - 12:13:59: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
12 Mar - 12:14:08: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
12 Mar - 12:14:11: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
12 Mar - 12:14:17: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
12 Mar - 12:14:19: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
12 Mar - 12:14:22: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
Hi @admin @Moderator_1 @Moderator_2 ,
Facing the below issue with Market Quote End Point after just about 10 to 15 minutes. As you can see it is within the limit of 1 per second.
My Question: Is there is there some extra limit like maximum 500 calls per day?
11 Mar - 11:06:31: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
11 Mar - 11:06:33: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
11 Mar - 11:06:36: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
11 Mar - 11:06:39: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
11 Mar - 11:06:41: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
11 Mar - 11:06:44: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
11 Mar - 11:06:47: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
11 Mar - 11:06:50: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
11 Mar - 11:06:52: Failed to fetch data: Access denied because of exceeding access rate
Sorry - I mean to say that LTP data is coming, but gets cut in a few seconds....
Hi @admin @Moderator_1 @Moderator_2 ,
I am facing this issue while trying to subscribe to just 5 tokens for just LTP. But note that the LTP data is not coming.
I am not sure if the issue is related to some previous connection that may be open since I have been playing around with the websocket-V2 code since morning.
If so how exactly to close/remove the previous websocket connections?
Or is it some other issue?
Thanks in advance
Cyriac
PyDev console: starting.
Python 3.8.9 (tags/v3.8.9:a743f81, Apr 6 2021, 14:02:34) [MSC v.1928 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
on open
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39320', 'sequence_number': 42423890, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542347000, 'last_traded_price': 44485, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39321', 'sequence_number': 42423740, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542347000, 'last_traded_price': 20735, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39326', 'sequence_number': 42424284, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542347000, 'last_traded_price': 24520, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39325', 'sequence_number': 42423847, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542347000, 'last_traded_price': 38295, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39328', 'sequence_number': 42423889, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542347000, 'last_traded_price': 32565, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39338', 'sequence_number': 42423739, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542347000, 'last_traded_price': 28815, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39325', 'sequence_number': 42425407, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542347000, 'last_traded_price': 38080, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
[W 240304 14:22:26 smartWebSocketV2:319] Attempting to resubscribe/reconnect (Attempt 1)...
on open
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39320', 'sequence_number': 42451808, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542359000, 'last_traded_price': 43785, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39321', 'sequence_number': 42452193, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542359000, 'last_traded_price': 21060, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39326', 'sequence_number': 42450167, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542358000, 'last_traded_price': 24865, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39325', 'sequence_number': 42451888, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542359000, 'last_traded_price': 37645, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39328', 'sequence_number': 42451807, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542359000, 'last_traded_price': 32045, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39338', 'sequence_number': 42452187, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542359000, 'last_traded_price': 29185, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39326', 'sequence_number': 42452287, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542359000, 'last_traded_price': 24860, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
Ticks: {'subscription_mode': 1, 'exchange_type': 2, 'token': '39326', 'sequence_number': 42452693, 'exchange_timestamp': 1709542359000, 'last_traded_price': 24865, 'subscription_mode_val': 'LTP'}
[W 240304 14:22:38 smartWebSocketV2:343] Connection closed due to max retry attempts reached.
[W 240304 14:22:38 smartWebSocketV2:343] Connection closed due to max retry attempts reached.
[W 240304 14:22:38 smartWebSocketV2:343] Connection closed due to max retry attempts reached.
Connection closed
Connection closed
Connection closed
Hi @admin and @Moderator_1 , @Moderator_2
Just a quick question here. I am looking to be able to calculate the margin for Options via API. The above end point should work fine, but I am wondering how to implement it for Option sell position when an buy position is already open.
As you are aware, there is a difference in margin calculations for naked sell and covered sell. So please can you give some information regarding this.
Many Thanks
Cyriac
Dear Traders,
If you feel that the Admins should respond more to our outstanding queries, please upvote and comment on this post.
Really, Angel has the potential to become the best broker in India for Algo traders, but there is no follow up and adequate quality control for the API.
Hoping that Angel will devote more resources to the API Team.
Regards
Cyriac
@Vignesha Adding a small delay usually reduces the number of errors usually.
@admin The reason there are so many errors is that often many traders are using get_position constantly. This is because the web socket 2.0 is often failing. Sometimes, if the get_holdings returns stale LTP, often I have to write a custom function that will get_holdings and loop for all stocks to get LTP. So if I have 5 stocks in my holdings, instead of one call to the API, I have to make 6 calls. The Angel API is being overworked. Please try to fix these....
I face this issue frequently while using get_position endpoint. Although it is well within the limits specified in the documentation....
https://smartapi.angelbroking.com/docs/RateLimit
@psm007 The limits are per second in theory, but not too sure about practice unfortunately....